Correlation Between Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Emerging Markets and Goldman Sachs Local, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Emerging with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs

-0.11
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Goldman is -0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Emerging Markets and Goldman Sachs Local in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Local and Mfs Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Local has no effect on the direction of Mfs Emerging i.e., Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Emerging is expected to generate 1.45 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Mfs Emerging is 1.03 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Local. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Local is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  362.00  in Goldman Sachs Local on January 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Local or generate 8.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Emerging Markets  vs.  Goldman Sachs Local

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Local 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Local are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Emerging and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Mfs Emerging Markets and Goldman Sachs Local pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites