Keck Seng Company Top Insiders
| KCKSF Stock | USD 0.33 0.02 6.45% |
Keck Seng employs about 1.5 K people. The company is managed by 13 executives with a total tenure of roughly 186 years, averaging almost 14.0 years of service per executive, having 114.77 employees per reported executive. Examination of Keck Seng's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
| Kim Ho Chairman Executive Chairman of the Board |
| Kian Ho Chairman Deputy Executive Chairman |
Keck |
Keck Seng Management Team Effectiveness
Keck Seng's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Keck Seng manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Keck Seng Workforce Comparison
Keck Seng Investments is rated second overall in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Lodging industry is now estimated at about 643,790. Keck Seng adds roughly 1,492 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Lodging industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.1) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of (0.08) %, which suggests for every $100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating loss of $0.08. Keck Seng Investments Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Keck Seng Investments Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Keck Seng price series and its benchmark/peer.
Keck Seng Notable Stakeholders
A Keck Seng stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Keck Seng often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Keck Seng's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Keck Seng's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Kim Ho | Executive Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Kian Ho | Deputy Executive Chairman | Profile | |
| See Tse | Executive Director, Member of Nomination Committee and Member of Remuneration Committee | Profile | |
| Chung Ho | Executive Director and Member of Nomination Committee | Profile | |
| Yuet Yu | Executive Director and Member of Remuneration Committee | Profile | |
| Yau Chan | Independent Non-Executive Director | Profile | |
| Chi Kwok | Independent Non-Executive Director | Profile | |
| Poey Wang | Independent Non-Executive Director | Profile | |
| Lui Chan | Executive Director | Profile | |
| Stephen Tan | Independent Non-Executive Director | Profile | |
| Hon Yu | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
| Sing Ng | Company Secretary | Profile | |
| Ka Cheng | Company Sec | Profile |
About Keck Seng Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Keck Seng Investments often depends on how effective the management is. Keck Seng management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Keck management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Keck management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Keck Seng Investments Limited, an investment holding company, engages in the hotel and club operations, and property investment and development activities. The company was incorporated in 1973 and is based in Central, Hong Kong. Keck Seng operates under Lodging classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange. It employs 1492 people.
The data published in Keck Seng's official financial statements usually reflect Keck Seng's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Keck Seng Investments. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Keck accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Keck Seng's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Consumer Cyclical space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Keck Seng's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Keck Seng's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Keck Seng's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Keck Seng Investments. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Keck Seng's management manipulating its earnings.
Keck Seng Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Keck Seng use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Keck Seng within its industry.Keck Seng Manpower Efficiency
Return on Keck Seng Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 323.6K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 37.1M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 130.5K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 15M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 1.2M | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 140.1M |
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Keck Seng Investments. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.
Complementary Tools for Keck Pink Sheet analysis
When running Keck Seng's price analysis, check to measure Keck Seng's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Keck Seng is operating at the current time. Most of Keck Seng's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Keck Seng's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Keck Seng's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Keck Seng to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
| Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |