Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder Companies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Estee Lauder. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Estee is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder Companies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Estee Lauder Companies and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Estee Lauder. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Estee Lauder Companies has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 3.03 times less return on investment than Estee Lauder. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 2.86 times less risky than Estee Lauder. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Estee Lauder Companies is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13,931  in Estee Lauder Companies on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  805.00  from holding Estee Lauder Companies or generate 5.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Estee Lauder Companies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Estee Lauder Companies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Estee Lauder Companies are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite weak essential indicators, Estee Lauder disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Estee Lauder can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Estee Lauder will offset losses from the drop in Estee Lauder's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Estee Lauder Companies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities