Correlation Between Starbucks and Dine Brands
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Starbucks and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Starbucks and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Starbucks and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Starbucks and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Starbucks with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Starbucks and Dine Brands.
Diversification Opportunities for Starbucks and Dine Brands
0.39 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Starbucks and Dine is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Starbucks and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and Starbucks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Starbucks are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of Starbucks i.e., Starbucks and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Starbucks and Dine Brands
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Starbucks is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Dine Brands. However, Starbucks is 1.49 times less risky than Dine Brands. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 8,188 in Starbucks on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 687.00 from holding Starbucks or generate 8.39% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Very Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Starbucks vs. Dine Brands Global
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Starbucks |
| Dine Brands Global |
Starbucks and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Starbucks and Dine Brands
The main advantage of trading using opposite Starbucks and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Starbucks position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.| Starbucks vs. Chipotle Mexican Grill | Starbucks vs. Dominos Pizza | Starbucks vs. Yum Brands | Starbucks vs. The Wendys Co |
| Dine Brands vs. Bloomin Brands | Dine Brands vs. BJs Restaurants | Dine Brands vs. The Cheesecake Factory | Dine Brands vs. Brinker International |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity |