Correlation Between Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stone Harbor Local and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stone Harbor with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging.
Diversification Opportunities for Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging
0.98 | Correlation Coefficient |
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Stone and Mfs is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stone Harbor Local and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Stone Harbor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stone Harbor Local are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Stone Harbor i.e., Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging
Assuming the 90 days horizon Stone Harbor Local is expected to generate 1.05 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Stone Harbor is 1.05 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about -0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.33 per unit of risk. If you would invest 819.00 in Stone Harbor Local on January 19, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (26.00) from holding Stone Harbor Local or give up 3.17% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Stone Harbor Local vs. Mfs Emerging Markets
Performance |
Timeline |
Stone Harbor Local |
Mfs Emerging Markets |
Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging
The main advantage of trading using opposite Stone Harbor and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stone Harbor position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.Stone Harbor vs. HUMANA INC | Stone Harbor vs. Aquagold International | Stone Harbor vs. Thrivent High Yield | Stone Harbor vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation |
Mfs Emerging vs. HUMANA INC | Mfs Emerging vs. Aquagold International | Mfs Emerging vs. Thrivent High Yield | Mfs Emerging vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital |