# Correlation Between B of A and Citigroup

##### Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both B of A and Citigroup at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining B of A and Citigroup into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank Of America and Citigroup, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on B of A and Citigroup and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in B of A with a short position of Citigroup. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of B of A and Citigroup.

## Diversification Opportunities for B of A and Citigroup

 0.87 Correlation Coefficient

### Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between BAC and Citigroup is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank Of America and Citigroup in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Citigroup and B of A is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank Of America are associated (or correlated) with Citigroup. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Citigroup has no effect on the direction of B of A i.e., B of A and Citigroup go up and down completely randomly.

## Pair Corralation between B of A and Citigroup

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank Of America is expected to under-perform the Citigroup. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank Of America is 1.08 times less risky than Citigroup. The stock trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Citigroup is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,147  in Citigroup on March 8, 2023 and sell it today you would lose (425.00)  from holding Citigroup or give up 8.26% of portfolio value over 90 days.
 Time Period 3 Months [change] Direction Moves Together Strength Strong Accuracy 100.0% Values Daily Returns

## Bank Of America  vs.  Citigroup

 Performance (%)
 Timeline
 Bank Of America Correlation Profile

### 0 of 100

Over the last 90 days Bank Of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
 Performance Backtest Predict
 Citigroup Correlation Profile

### 0 of 100

Over the last 90 days Citigroup has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, Citigroup is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
 Performance Backtest Predict

## B of A and Citigroup Volatility Contrast

 Predicted Return Density
 Returns

## Pair Trading with B of A and Citigroup

The main advantage of trading using opposite B of A and Citigroup positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if B of A position performs unexpectedly, Citigroup can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Citigroup will offset losses from the drop in Citigroup's long position.
 B of A vs. M3 Brigade Acquisition II B of A vs. JetBlue Airways Corp B of A vs. Nok Airlines Public B of A vs. Iridium Communications
The idea behind Bank Of America and Citigroup pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
 Citigroup vs. SilverSPAC Inc Unit Citigroup vs. Mediag3 Citigroup vs. Emerson Radio Citigroup vs. Perseus Mining Limited
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

## Other Complementary Tools

 Portfolio RebalancingAnalyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets Equity SearchSearch for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets Volatility AnalysisGet historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data Correlation AnalysisReduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated Fundamentals ComparisonCompare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities Balance Of PowerCheck stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios Price TransformationUse Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets Stock ScreenerFind equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.