Correlation Between Bank of America and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Goldman Sachs Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Goldman Sachs

0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Goldman is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Goldman Sachs Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Group and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Group has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Goldman Sachs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 3.7 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Bank of America is 1.09 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Group. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Group is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  31,019  in Goldman Sachs Group on January 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,292  from holding Goldman Sachs Group or generate 29.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Goldman Sachs Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2024.
Goldman Sachs Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Bank of America and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Goldman Sachs Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated