Correlation Between Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Adaptive Risk and Absolute Capital Defender, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Adaptive with a short position of Absolute Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Absolute is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Adaptive Risk and Absolute Capital Defender in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Absolute Capital Defender and Columbia Adaptive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Adaptive Risk are associated (or correlated) with Absolute Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Absolute Capital Defender has no effect on the direction of Columbia Adaptive i.e., Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Adaptive Risk is expected to under-perform the Absolute Capital. In addition to that, Columbia Adaptive is 1.24 times more volatile than Absolute Capital Defender. It trades about -0.22 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Absolute Capital Defender is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,020  in Absolute Capital Defender on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (15.00) from holding Absolute Capital Defender or give up 1.47% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbia Adaptive Risk  vs.  Absolute Capital Defender

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbia Adaptive Risk 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Adaptive Risk are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Adaptive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Absolute Capital Defender 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Absolute Capital Defender are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Absolute Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Adaptive and Absolute Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Adaptive position performs unexpectedly, Absolute Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Absolute Capital will offset losses from the drop in Absolute Capital's long position.
The idea behind Columbia Adaptive Risk and Absolute Capital Defender pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
AI Investment Finder
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance