Correlation Between New Perspective and Capital World

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both New Perspective and Capital World at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining New Perspective and Capital World into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between New Perspective Fund and Capital World Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on New Perspective and Capital World and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in New Perspective with a short position of Capital World. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of New Perspective and Capital World.

Diversification Opportunities for New Perspective and Capital World

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between New and Capital is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding New Perspective Fund and Capital World Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Capital World Growth and New Perspective is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on New Perspective Fund are associated (or correlated) with Capital World. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Capital World Growth has no effect on the direction of New Perspective i.e., New Perspective and Capital World go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between New Perspective and Capital World

Assuming the 90 days horizon New Perspective Fund is expected to under-perform the Capital World. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, New Perspective Fund is 1.05 times less risky than Capital World. The mutual fund trades about -0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Capital World Growth is currently generating about -0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,442  in Capital World Growth on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (132.00) from holding Capital World Growth or give up 2.05% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

New Perspective Fund  vs.  Capital World Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
New Perspective 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in New Perspective Fund are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, New Perspective is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Capital World Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Capital World Growth are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical indicators, Capital World is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

New Perspective and Capital World Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with New Perspective and Capital World

The main advantage of trading using opposite New Perspective and Capital World positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if New Perspective position performs unexpectedly, Capital World can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Capital World will offset losses from the drop in Capital World's long position.
The idea behind New Perspective Fund and Capital World Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated