Correlation Between American Funds and Johnson Johnson

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both American Funds and Johnson Johnson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining American Funds and Johnson Johnson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between American Funds Lege and Johnson Johnson, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on American Funds and Johnson Johnson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in American Funds with a short position of Johnson Johnson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of American Funds and Johnson Johnson.

Diversification Opportunities for American Funds and Johnson Johnson

0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between American and Johnson is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding American Funds Lege and Johnson Johnson in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Johnson Johnson and American Funds is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on American Funds Lege are associated (or correlated) with Johnson Johnson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Johnson Johnson has no effect on the direction of American Funds i.e., American Funds and Johnson Johnson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between American Funds and Johnson Johnson

Assuming the 90 days horizon American Funds Lege is expected to generate 0.32 times more return on investment than Johnson Johnson. However, American Funds Lege is 3.08 times less risky than Johnson Johnson. It trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Johnson Johnson is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,156  in American Funds Lege on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (9.00) from holding American Funds Lege or give up 0.78% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

American Funds Lege  vs.  Johnson Johnson

 Performance 
       Timeline  
American Funds Lege 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days American Funds Lege has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, American Funds is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Johnson Johnson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Johnson Johnson has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively steady basic indicators, Johnson Johnson is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price chaos, may contribute to medium-term losses for the stakeholders.

American Funds and Johnson Johnson Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with American Funds and Johnson Johnson

The main advantage of trading using opposite American Funds and Johnson Johnson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if American Funds position performs unexpectedly, Johnson Johnson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Johnson Johnson will offset losses from the drop in Johnson Johnson's long position.
The idea behind American Funds Lege and Johnson Johnson pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements