Correlation Between EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between EnLink Midstream LLC and Goldman Sachs Physical, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in EnLink Midstream with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs

0.93
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between EnLink and Goldman is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding EnLink Midstream LLC and Goldman Sachs Physical in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Physical and EnLink Midstream is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on EnLink Midstream LLC are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Physical has no effect on the direction of EnLink Midstream i.e., EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days EnLink Midstream is expected to generate 1.73 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, EnLink Midstream LLC is 1.29 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Physical is currently generating about 0.26 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,156  in Goldman Sachs Physical on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  140.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Physical or generate 6.49% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy91.3%
ValuesDaily Returns

EnLink Midstream LLC  vs.  Goldman Sachs Physical

 Performance 
       Timeline  
EnLink Midstream LLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in EnLink Midstream LLC are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak essential indicators, EnLink Midstream may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2024.
Goldman Sachs Physical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Physical are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite EnLink Midstream and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if EnLink Midstream position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind EnLink Midstream LLC and Goldman Sachs Physical pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences