Correlation Between Capital World and New Perspective

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Capital World and New Perspective at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Capital World and New Perspective into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Capital World Growth and New Perspective Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Capital World and New Perspective and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Capital World with a short position of New Perspective. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Capital World and New Perspective.

Diversification Opportunities for Capital World and New Perspective

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Capital and New is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Capital World Growth and New Perspective Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on New Perspective and Capital World is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Capital World Growth are associated (or correlated) with New Perspective. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of New Perspective has no effect on the direction of Capital World i.e., Capital World and New Perspective go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Capital World and New Perspective

Assuming the 90 days horizon Capital World Growth is expected to generate 0.9 times more return on investment than New Perspective. However, Capital World Growth is 1.11 times less risky than New Perspective. It trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. New Perspective Fund is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,441  in Capital World Growth on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (119.00) from holding Capital World Growth or give up 1.85% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Capital World Growth  vs.  New Perspective Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Capital World Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Capital World Growth are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Capital World is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
New Perspective 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in New Perspective Fund are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, New Perspective is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Capital World and New Perspective Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Capital World and New Perspective

The main advantage of trading using opposite Capital World and New Perspective positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Capital World position performs unexpectedly, New Perspective can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in New Perspective will offset losses from the drop in New Perspective's long position.
The idea behind Capital World Growth and New Perspective Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope