Correlation Between GM and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Procter Gamble

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Procter is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Procter Gamble

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.86 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, GM is 1.86 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,522  in General Motors on January 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  715.00  from holding General Motors or generate 20.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly conflicting technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2024.

GM and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges