Correlation Between LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between LiCycle Holdings Corp and Guggenheim Styleplus , you can compare the effects of market volatilities on LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in LiCycle Holdings with a short position of Guggenheim Styleplus. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus.

Diversification Opportunities for LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between LiCycle and Guggenheim is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding LiCycle Holdings Corp and Guggenheim Styleplus in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guggenheim Styleplus and LiCycle Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on LiCycle Holdings Corp are associated (or correlated) with Guggenheim Styleplus. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guggenheim Styleplus has no effect on the direction of LiCycle Holdings i.e., LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus

Given the investment horizon of 90 days LiCycle Holdings Corp is expected to generate 20.03 times more return on investment than Guggenheim Styleplus. However, LiCycle Holdings is 20.03 times more volatile than Guggenheim Styleplus . It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guggenheim Styleplus is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  41.00  in LiCycle Holdings Corp on January 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  29.00  from holding LiCycle Holdings Corp or generate 70.73% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

LiCycle Holdings Corp  vs.  Guggenheim Styleplus

 Performance 
       Timeline  
LiCycle Holdings Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in LiCycle Holdings Corp are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly inconsistent fundamental indicators, LiCycle Holdings showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Guggenheim Styleplus 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Styleplus are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Guggenheim Styleplus is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus

The main advantage of trading using opposite LiCycle Holdings and Guggenheim Styleplus positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if LiCycle Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Guggenheim Styleplus can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guggenheim Styleplus will offset losses from the drop in Guggenheim Styleplus' long position.
The idea behind LiCycle Holdings Corp and Guggenheim Styleplus pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated