Correlation Between McDonalds and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both McDonalds and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining McDonalds and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between McDonalds and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on McDonalds and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in McDonalds with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of McDonalds and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for McDonalds and Procter Gamble

-0.06
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between McDonalds and Procter is -0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding McDonalds and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and McDonalds is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on McDonalds are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of McDonalds i.e., McDonalds and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between McDonalds and Procter Gamble

Considering the 90-day investment horizon McDonalds is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, McDonalds is 1.03 times less risky than Procter Gamble. The stock trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  15,916  in Procter Gamble on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  234.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 1.47% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

McDonalds  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance 
       Timeline  
McDonalds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days McDonalds has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest fragile performance, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

McDonalds and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with McDonalds and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite McDonalds and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if McDonalds position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind McDonalds and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon