# Correlation Between Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway

##### Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Marcus with a short position of Berkshire Hathaway. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway.

## Diversification Opportunities for Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway

 0.29 Correlation Coefficient

### Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Marcus and Berkshire is 0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Berkshire Hathaway and Marcus is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Marcus are associated (or correlated) with Berkshire Hathaway. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Berkshire Hathaway has no effect on the direction of Marcus i.e., Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway go up and down completely randomly.

## Pair Corralation between Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Marcus is expected to generate 1.49 times more return on investment than Berkshire Hathaway. However, Marcus is 1.49 times more volatile than Berkshire Hathaway. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Berkshire Hathaway is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,388  in Marcus on October 29, 2022 and sell it today you would earn a total of  101.00  from holding Marcus or generate 7.28% return on investment over 90 days.
 Time Period 3 Months [change] Direction Moves Together Strength Very Weak Accuracy 95.24% Values Daily Returns

## Marcus  vs.  Berkshire Hathaway

 Performance (%)
 Timeline
 Marcus Correlation Profile
Marcus Performance
1 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Marcus are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable fundamental indicators, Marcus is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

### Marcus Price Channel

 Performance Backtest Predict
 Berkshire Hathaway Correlation Profile
Berkshire Performance
5 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Berkshire Hathaway are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Berkshire Hathaway is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

### Berkshire Price Channel

 Performance Backtest Predict

## Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway Volatility Contrast

 Predicted Return Density
 Returns

## Pair Trading with Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway

The main advantage of trading using opposite Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Marcus position performs unexpectedly, Berkshire Hathaway can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Berkshire Hathaway will offset losses from the drop in Berkshire Hathaway's long position.
 Marcus vs. AMC Networks Marcus vs. Altice USA Marcus vs. Beasley Broadcast Group Marcus vs. Cable One
The idea behind Marcus and Berkshire Hathaway pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
 Berkshire Hathaway vs. Arlington Asset Investment Berkshire Hathaway vs. Ares Commercial Real Berkshire Hathaway vs. Senmiao Technology Berkshire Hathaway vs. Affiliated Managers Group
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

## Other Complementary Tools

 Analyst RecommendationsAnalyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories Share PortfolioTrack or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device Equity SearchSearch for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets Financial WidgetsEasily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets Share PortfolioTrack or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device Theme RatingsDetermine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance