Correlation Between SPDR Russell and Powered Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SPDR Russell and Powered Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SPDR Russell and Powered Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SPDR Russell 1000 and Powered Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SPDR Russell and Powered Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SPDR Russell with a short position of Powered Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SPDR Russell and Powered Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for SPDR Russell and Powered Brands

-0.57
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between SPDR and Powered is -0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SPDR Russell 1000 and Powered Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Powered Brands and SPDR Russell is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SPDR Russell 1000 are associated (or correlated) with Powered Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Powered Brands has no effect on the direction of SPDR Russell i.e., SPDR Russell and Powered Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between SPDR Russell and Powered Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days SPDR Russell is expected to generate 214.52 times less return on investment than Powered Brands. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, SPDR Russell 1000 is 59.52 times less risky than Powered Brands. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Powered Brands is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  19.00  in Powered Brands on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (19.00) from holding Powered Brands or give up 100.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy25.86%
ValuesDaily Returns

SPDR Russell 1000  vs.  Powered Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
SPDR Russell 1000 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in SPDR Russell 1000 are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, SPDR Russell is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Powered Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Powered Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Powered Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.

SPDR Russell and Powered Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with SPDR Russell and Powered Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite SPDR Russell and Powered Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SPDR Russell position performs unexpectedly, Powered Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Powered Brands will offset losses from the drop in Powered Brands' long position.
The idea behind SPDR Russell 1000 and Powered Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Investment Finder module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments