Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Home Depot

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Home Depot at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Home Depot into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Home Depot, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Home Depot and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Home Depot. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Home Depot.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Home Depot

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Home is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Home Depot in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Home Depot and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Home Depot. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Home Depot has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Home Depot go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Home Depot

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.69 times more return on investment than Home Depot. However, Procter Gamble is 1.46 times less risky than Home Depot. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Home Depot is currently generating about -0.47 per unit of risk. If you would invest  15,952  in Procter Gamble on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  308.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 1.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Home Depot

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Home Depot 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Home Depot has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, Home Depot is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Procter Gamble and Home Depot Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Home Depot

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Home Depot positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Home Depot can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Home Depot will offset losses from the drop in Home Depot's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Home Depot pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance