Correlation Between ATT and Cisco Systems

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both ATT and Cisco Systems at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining ATT and Cisco Systems into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between ATT Inc and Cisco Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on ATT and Cisco Systems and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in ATT with a short position of Cisco Systems. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of ATT and Cisco Systems.

Diversification Opportunities for ATT and Cisco Systems

0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between ATT and Cisco is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ATT Inc and Cisco Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cisco Systems and ATT is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on ATT Inc are associated (or correlated) with Cisco Systems. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cisco Systems has no effect on the direction of ATT i.e., ATT and Cisco Systems go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between ATT and Cisco Systems

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon ATT Inc is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Cisco Systems. However, ATT Inc is 1.0 times less risky than Cisco Systems. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cisco Systems is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,690  in ATT Inc on January 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (40.00) from holding ATT Inc or give up 2.37% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

ATT Inc  vs.  Cisco Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
ATT Inc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ATT Inc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, ATT is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cisco Systems has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

ATT and Cisco Systems Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with ATT and Cisco Systems

The main advantage of trading using opposite ATT and Cisco Systems positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if ATT position performs unexpectedly, Cisco Systems can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cisco Systems will offset losses from the drop in Cisco Systems' long position.
The idea behind ATT Inc and Cisco Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets