Correlation Between Uber Technologies and Exxon

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Uber Technologies and Exxon at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Uber Technologies and Exxon into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Uber Technologies and Exxon Mobil Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Uber Technologies and Exxon and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Uber Technologies with a short position of Exxon. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Uber Technologies and Exxon.

Diversification Opportunities for Uber Technologies and Exxon

0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Uber Technologies and Exxon is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Uber Technologies and Exxon Mobil Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Exxon Mobil Corp and Uber Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Uber Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Exxon. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Exxon Mobil Corp has no effect on the direction of Uber Technologies i.e., Uber Technologies and Exxon go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Uber Technologies and Exxon

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Uber Technologies is expected to generate 1.53 times more return on investment than Exxon. However, Uber Technologies is 1.53 times more volatile than Exxon Mobil Corp. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Exxon Mobil Corp is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,889  in Uber Technologies on July 6, 2022 and sell it today you would earn a total of  30.00  from holding Uber Technologies or generate 1.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Uber Technologies  vs.  Exxon Mobil Corp

 Performance (%) 
       Timeline  
Uber Technologies 
Uber Technologies Performance
10 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Uber Technologies are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Uber Technologies reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Uber Technologies Price Channel

Exxon Mobil Corp 
Exxon Performance
8 of 100
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Exxon Mobil Corp are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively weak basic indicators, Exxon revealed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Exxon Price Channel

Uber Technologies and Exxon Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Uber Technologies and Exxon

The main advantage of trading using opposite Uber Technologies and Exxon positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Uber Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Exxon can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Exxon will offset losses from the drop in Exxon's long position.
Uber Technologies vs. Ajinomoto Co
Uber Technologies vs. Lamb Weston Holdings
Uber Technologies vs. Jeronimo Martins Pe
Uber Technologies vs. Grupo Bimbo SA
The idea behind Uber Technologies and Exxon Mobil Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Exxon vs. Chevron Corp
Check out your portfolio center. Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try CEO Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Go
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Go
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Go
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Go
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Go
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Go
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Go
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolio or rebalance existing positions based on mean-variance optimization algorithm
Go