Fat Brands Stock Z Score
| FAT Stock | USD 7.50 0.26 3.59% |
FAT | Z Score |
FAT Brands Company Z Score Analysis
FAT Brands' Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
FAT Z Score Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for FAT Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of FAT Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Z Score. Since FAT Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of FAT Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of FAT Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
| Competition |
According to the company's disclosures, FAT Brands has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 100.0% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
FAT Z Score Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses FAT Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Z Score to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of FAT Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing FAT Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.FAT Brands is currently under evaluation in z score category among related companies.
FAT Brands Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in FAT Brands that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of FAT Brands' outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing FAT Brands' value.| Shares | Cambridge Invest Research Advisors, Inc. | 2023-12-31 | 10.7 K | Advisor Group Holdings, Inc. | 2023-12-31 | 5.3 K | Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts | 2023-12-31 | 4.6 K | Copeland Capital Management, Llc | 2024-03-31 | 3.5 K | Tower Research Capital Llc | 2023-12-31 | 3.1 K | Wells Fargo & Co | 2023-12-31 | 2.5 K | Psi Advisors, Llc | 2023-12-31 | 1000 | Hartland & Co | 2023-12-31 | 500 | Royal Bank Of Canada | 2023-12-31 | 66.0 | Adw Capital Management, Llc | 2023-12-31 | 587.4 K | Vanguard Group Inc | 2023-12-31 | 188.8 K |
FAT Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -1.57 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0031 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.19) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.12) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.6 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 15.69 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 70.79 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 6.95 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 54.76 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 16.21 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 12.81 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.25 X | ||||
| Revenue | 480.46 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 140.99 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 56.83 M | ||||
| Net Income | (90.11 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 23.91 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 1.44 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.38 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 7.20 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 0.41 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | (17.75) X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (35.61 M) | ||||
| Short Ratio | 3.88 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (5.85) X | ||||
| Target Price | 20.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 2.6 K | ||||
| Beta | 1.87 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 121.18 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 1.39 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (268.78 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | (155.59 M) | ||||
| Current Asset | 1.99 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 13.48 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.08 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 1.39 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.56 |
About FAT Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze FAT Brands's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of FAT Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of FAT Brands based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards FAT Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, FAT Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from FAT Brands options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out FAT Brands Piotroski F Score and FAT Brands Valuation analysis. For more information on how to buy FAT Stock please use our How to Invest in FAT Brands guide.Note that the FAT Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other FAT Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.
Complementary Tools for FAT Stock analysis
When running FAT Brands' price analysis, check to measure FAT Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FAT Brands is operating at the current time. Most of FAT Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FAT Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FAT Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FAT Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
| Sync Your Broker Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors. | |
| Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing |
Is FAT Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of FAT Brands. If investors know FAT will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about FAT Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 112.056 | Dividend Share 0.56 | Earnings Share (5.85) | Revenue Per Share 28.945 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.528 |
The market value of FAT Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of FAT that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of FAT Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is FAT Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because FAT Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect FAT Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between FAT Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if FAT Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, FAT Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.