Great Lakes Dredge Stock Piotroski F Score
| GLDD Stock | USD 7.44 0.19 2.49% |
Great | Piotroski F Score |
At this time, it appears that Great Lakes' Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
6.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
| Current Return On Assets | Positive |
| Change in Return on Assets | Decreased |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | Positive |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | Improving |
| Asset Turnover Growth | Increase |
| Current Ratio Change | Decrease |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | Lower Leverage |
| Change In Outstending Shares | Decrease |
| Change in Gross Margin | No Change |
Great Lakes Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Great Lakes is to make sure Great is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Great Lakes' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Great Lakes' financial numbers are properly reported.
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.92 | 0.5079 |
|
| |||||
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.11 | 0.1299 |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 146.3 M | 179.4 M |
|
| |||||
| Non Current Liabilities Total | 411.3 M | 595.9 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Assets | 745.6 M | 1.2 B |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Assets | 234.3 M | 208.2 M |
|
|
Great Lakes Dredge F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Great Lakes' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Great Lakes in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Great Lakes Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.Book Value Per Share |
|
About Great Lakes Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Great Lakes Dredge's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Great Lakes using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Great Lakes Dredge based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Great Lakes in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Great Lakes' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Great Lakes options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Great Lakes Altman Z Score, Great Lakes Correlation, Great Lakes Valuation, as well as analyze Great Lakes Alpha and Beta and Great Lakes Hype Analysis. Note that the Great Lakes Dredge information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Great Lakes' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Complementary Tools for Great Stock analysis
When running Great Lakes' price analysis, check to measure Great Lakes' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Great Lakes is operating at the current time. Most of Great Lakes' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Great Lakes' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Great Lakes' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Great Lakes to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
| Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
| CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
| Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios |
Is Great Lakes' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Great Lakes. If investors know Great will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Great Lakes listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.292 | Earnings Share 0.21 | Revenue Per Share 8.871 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.239 | Return On Assets 0.0109 |
The market value of Great Lakes Dredge is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Great that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Great Lakes' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Great Lakes' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Great Lakes' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Great Lakes' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Great Lakes' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Great Lakes is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Great Lakes' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.