This module uses fundamental data of Gartner to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Gartner M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Gartner Piotroski F Score and Gartner Altman Z Score analysis.
At this time, Gartner's Short and Long Term Debt Total is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Net Debt is likely to gain to about 1.8 B in 2024, whereas Debt To Assets are likely to drop 0.23 in 2024. At this time, Gartner's PB Ratio is comparatively stable compared to the past year. EV To Sales is likely to gain to 6.65 in 2024, whereas ROIC is likely to drop 0.22 in 2024.
At this time, it appears that Gartner is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Gartner's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Gartner executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Gartner's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Gartner's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Gartner's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Gartner in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Gartner's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Current Deferred Revenue
2.77 Billion
At this time, Gartner's Current Deferred Revenue is comparatively stable compared to the past year.
Gartner Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Gartner. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Gartner's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Gartner's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environment Score
Governance Score
Social Score
About Gartner Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Gartner's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Gartner using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Gartner based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
When determining whether Gartner is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Gartner Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Gartner Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Gartner Stock:
For more information on how to buy Gartner Stock please use our How to Invest in Gartner guide.You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.
Complementary Tools for Gartner Stock analysis
When running Gartner's price analysis, check to measure Gartner's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Gartner is operating at the current time. Most of Gartner's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Gartner's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Gartner's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Gartner to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Is Gartner's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Gartner. If investors know Gartner will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Gartner listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.17)
Earnings Share
11.08
Revenue Per Share
74.768
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.054
Return On Assets
0.0934
The market value of Gartner is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Gartner that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Gartner's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Gartner's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Gartner's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Gartner's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Gartner's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Gartner is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Gartner's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.