John Hancock Esg Fund Piotroski F Score

JBOIX Fund  USD 9.13  0.01  0.11%   
This module uses fundamental data of John Hancock to approximate its Piotroski F score. John Hancock F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of John Hancock Esg. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about John Hancock financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any mutual fund could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.
  
At this time, it appears that John Hancock's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
0.0
Piotroski F Score - Inapplicable
Current Return On Assets

N/A

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

N/A

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

N/A

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

N/A

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

N/A

Focus
Current Ratio Change

N/A

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

N/A

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

N/A

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

N/A

Focus

John Hancock Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to John Hancock is to make sure John is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if John Hancock's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if John Hancock's financial numbers are properly reported.

About John Hancock Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

About John Hancock Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze John Hancock Esg's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of John Hancock using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of John Hancock Esg based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this mutual fund, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards John Hancock in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, John Hancock's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from John Hancock options trading.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in John Hancock Esg. Also, note that the market value of any mutual fund could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.
You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Please note, there is a significant difference between John Hancock's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if John Hancock is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, John Hancock's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.