Twitter Piotroski F Score

TWTR -  USA Stock  

USD 69.13  0.62  0.89%

This module uses fundamental data of Twitter to approximate its Piotroski F score. Twitter F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Twitter. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Twitter financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Additionally, take a look at Twitter Altman Z Score, Twitter Correlation, Twitter Valuation, as well as analyze Twitter Alpha and Beta and Twitter Hype Analysis.

Search Piotroski F Score 

 
Refresh
Twitter Total Debt is relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Twitter reported last year Total Debt of 1.52 Billion. As of 08/02/2021, Debt Non Current is likely to grow to about 1.6 B, while Debt Current is likely to drop slightly above 69.2 M. Twitter Net Current Assets as percentage of Total Assets are relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Twitter reported last year Net Current Assets as percentage of Total Assets of 49.96. As of 08/02/2021, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 0.34, while PPandE Turnover is likely to drop 2.86.
At this time, it appears that Twitter's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
5.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
1
Current Return On Assets
Negative
2
Change in Return on Assets
Decreased
3
Cash Flow Return on Assets
Positive
4
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)
Improving
5
Asset Turnover Growth
Increase
6
Current Ratio Change
Increase
7
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change
Higher Leverage
8
Change In Outstending Shares
Decrease
9
Change in Gross Margin
No Change

Twitter Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Twitter is to make sure Twitter is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Twitter's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Twitter's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Weighted Average Shares632.5 M787.9 M
Significantly Down
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Weighted Average Shares Diluted633.7 M787.9 M
Significantly Down
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Net Cash Flow from Operations1.1 B992.9 M
Significantly Up
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Total Assets14.4 B13.4 B
Significantly Up
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Total Liabilities5.8 B5.4 B
Significantly Up
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Current Assets9.3 B8.6 B
Significantly Up
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Current Liabilities2.1 BB
Significantly Up
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Total Debt1.6 B1.5 B
Significantly Up
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Return on Average Assets(9.39)(8.708)
Significantly Down
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Gross Margin55.1163.2331
Fairly Down
Increasing
Slightly volatile
Asset Turnover0.340.2842
Fairly Up
Decreasing
Slightly volatile

Twitter F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Twitter's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Twitter in a much-optimized way.

About Twitter Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Book Value per Share

5.17Share
Twitter Book Value per Share is relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Twitter reported last year Book Value per Share of 5.80

Twitter Current Valuation Drivers

We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Twitter from analyzing Twitter's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Twitter's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Twitter's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
201620172018201920202021 (projected)
Net Income Per Employee(127.16 K)(32.05 K)307.55 K299.11 K(205.91 K)(211.33 K)
Revenue Per Employee704.08 K724.59 K776.11 K705.99 K673.85 K584.92 K
Earnings Before Interest Taxes and Depreciation Amortization EBITDA(8.07 M)359.02 M851.43 M819.62 M485.36 M523.68 M

About Twitter Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Twitter's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Twitter using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Twitter based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Twitter, Inc. operates as a platform for public self-expression and conversation in real time United States, Japan, and internationally. Twitter, Inc. was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Twitter operates under Internet Content Information classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 6100 people.

Twitter Investors Sentiment

The influence of Twitter's investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Twitter. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock markets does not have a solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.

Current Sentiment - TWTR

Twitter Investor Sentiment

Majority of Macroaxis users are at this time bullish on Twitter. What is your outlook on investing in Twitter? Are you bullish or bearish?
Bullish
Bearish
98% Bullish
2% Bearish
Skip

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

Additionally, take a look at Twitter Altman Z Score, Twitter Correlation, Twitter Valuation, as well as analyze Twitter Alpha and Beta and Twitter Hype Analysis. Note that the Twitter information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Twitter's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Complementary Tools for Twitter Stock analysis

When running Twitter price analysis, check to measure Twitter's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Twitter is operating at the current time. Most of Twitter's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Twitter's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Twitter's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Twitter to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
ETF Directory
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Go
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Go
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Go
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Go
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Go
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Go
The market value of Twitter is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Twitter that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Twitter's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Twitter's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Twitter's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Twitter underlying business (such as pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Twitter's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Twitter value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Twitter's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.