Twitter Z Score

TWTR -  USA Stock  

USD 69.13  0.62  0.89%

Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Additionally, take a look at Twitter Piotroski F Score and Twitter Valuation analysis.

Search Z Score 

 
Refresh
Twitter Invested Capital Average is relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Twitter reported last year Invested Capital Average of 5 Billion. As of 08/02/2021, Market Capitalization is likely to grow to about 19.7 B, while Capital Expenditure is likely to drop (271.3 M). Twitter Selling General and Administrative Expense is relatively stable at the moment as compared to the past year. Twitter reported last year Selling General and Administrative Expense of 1.13 Billion. As of 08/02/2021, Income Tax Expense is likely to grow to about 15.6 M, while Earning Before Interest and Taxes EBIT is likely to drop (422.9 M).

Twitter Z Score Analysis

Twitter's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
 2018 2019 2021 (projected)
Long Term Debt to Equity0.260.290.27
Interest Coverage21.20.410.38
Z Score 
 = 
Sum Of  
 
5 Factors 
More About Z Score | All Equity Analysis

Current Twitter Z Score

    
  4.8  
Most of Twitter's fundamental indicators, such as Z Score, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Twitter is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
First Factor
 = 
1.2 * (
Working Capital
/
Total Assets )
Second Factor
 = 
1.4 * (
Retained Earnings
/
Total Assets )
Thrid Factor
 = 
3.3 * (
EBITAD
/
Total Assets )
Fouth Factor
 = 
0.6 * (
Market Value of Equity
/
Total Liabilities )
Fifth Factor
 = 
0.99 * (
Revenue
/
Total Assets )

Twitter Z Score Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Twitter is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Ford stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Z Score. Since Twitter's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Twitter's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Twitter's interrelated accounts and indicators.
To calculate Z-Score one would need to know current working capital of the company, its total assets, and liabilities, amount of latest retained earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Score can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area' with scores of less than 1, indicating the high probability of distress. Z Score is used widely by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processers, wealth advisers, as well as day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z score has been proved to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Compare to competition

Based on the company's disclosures, Twitter has a Z Score of 4.8. This is 350.0% lower than that of the Communication Services sector and significantly higher than that of the Internet Content & Information industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 44.95% higher than that of the company.

Twitter Z Score Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Twitter's direct or indirect competition against its Z Score to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Twitter could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Twitter by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
Twitter is currently under evaluation in z score category among related companies.

Twitter Current Valuation Drivers

We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Twitter from analyzing Twitter's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Twitter's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Twitter's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
201620172018201920202021 (projected)
Net Income Per Employee(127.16 K)(32.05 K)307.55 K299.11 K(205.91 K)(211.33 K)
Revenue Per Employee704.08 K724.59 K776.11 K705.99 K673.85 K584.92 K
Earnings Before Interest Taxes and Depreciation Amortization EBITDA(8.07 M)359.02 M851.43 M819.62 M485.36 M523.68 M

Twitter Fundamentals

About Twitter Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Twitter's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Twitter using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Twitter based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Twitter, Inc. operates as a platform for public self-expression and conversation in real time United States, Japan, and internationally. Twitter, Inc. was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Twitter operates under Internet Content Information classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 6100 people.

Be your own money manager

Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Twitter without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate.risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.

Did you try this?

Run Instant Ratings Now

   

Instant Ratings

Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
All  Next Launch Module

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

Additionally, take a look at Twitter Piotroski F Score and Twitter Valuation analysis. Note that the Twitter information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Twitter's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Equity Search module to search for activelly traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Complementary Tools for Twitter Stock analysis

When running Twitter price analysis, check to measure Twitter's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Twitter is operating at the current time. Most of Twitter's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Twitter's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Twitter's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Twitter to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Go
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolio or rebalance existing positions based on mean-variance optimization algorithm
Go
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Go
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Go
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Go
The market value of Twitter is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Twitter that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Twitter's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Twitter's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Twitter's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Twitter underlying business (such as pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Twitter's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Twitter value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Twitter's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.