ETFS Russell Fundamental Relationships

The Drivers Module shows relationships between ETFS Russell's most relevant fundamental drivers and provides multiple suggestions of what could possibly affect the performance of ETFS Russell 2000 US Small Cap GO ETF over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers. Please also check Risk vs Return Analysis.

ETFS Russell 2000 Equity Positions Weight vs. Net Asset Fundamental Analysis

ETFS Russell 2000 US Small Cap GO ETF is currently considered the top fund in net asset among similar funds. It is currently considered the top fund in equity positions weight among similar funds . The ratio of Net Asset to Equity Positions Weight for ETFS Russell 2000 US Small Cap GO ETF is about  587,152 
Net Asset is current market value of a fund less its liabilities. In a nutshell, if the fund is liquidated or all of the assest is sold out, the net asset will be the amount that the shareholders would demand back from the fund.
ETFS Russell 
Net Asset 
Current Market Value 
Current Liabilities 
58.68 M
Net Asset is the value used in calulating NAV of a fund. NAV (or Net Asset Value) is computed once a day based on the formullay that uses closing prices of all positions in the fund's portfolio.
Percentage of fund asset invested in equity instruments. About 80% of global funds and ETFs carry equity instruments on their balance sheet.
ETFS Russell 
Stock Percentage 
% of Equities 
in the fund 
99.94 %
Funds with most asset allocated to stocks can be subclassified into many different categories such as market capitalization or investment style.

ETFS Russell 2000 Equity Positions Weight Comparison

Thematic Opportunities

Explore Investment Opportunities

Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked.
Explore Thematic Ideas
Explore Investing Ideas  

ETFS Russell Ratio Contrast

Other ETFS Russell Fundamental Comparison