The Drivers Module shows relationships between IMEUA's most relevant fundamental drivers and provides multiple suggestions of what could possibly affect the performance of IMEUA over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers. Please also check Risk vs Return Analysis.
IMEUA Price to Earning vs. Holdings Turnover Fundamental Analysis
IMEUA is currently considered the top fund in holdings turnover among similar funds. It is currently considered the top fund in price to earning among similar funds reporting about 2.55 of Price to Earning per Holdings Turnover. Holding Turnover is calculated by adding up all the transactions for the year, dividing it by 2 and then dividing it again by the fund total holdings. Holding Turnover is the rate at which funds or ETFs replace their investment holdings on an annual basis. In other words it measures how quickly a fund turns over its holdings during the fiscal year.
|Holdings Turnover ( % )|
Investor can think of Holding Turnover as percentage of a fund's assets that have turned over in the past year. Typically, a high annual turnover ratio implies that fund managers made a lot of buying and selling. The higher the annual turnover, the higher the expense ratio for the fund.Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investor monitor on a daily basis. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because. When a company's profitability fall, it is likely that earnings will also go down..In other words, if you start from a lower position your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
IMEUA Price to Earning Comparison
IMEUA Fundamental Comparison