Designer Enterprise Value vs Operating Income Analysis
DBI Stock | USD 8.51 0.07 0.82% |
Designer Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just examining Designer Brands latest accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Designer Brands is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Designer Brands Enterprise Value and its Operating Income accounts. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.
Enterprise Value vs Operating Income
Enterprise Value vs Operating Income Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Designer Brands Enterprise Value account and Operating Income. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have no relationship.
The correlation between Designer Brands' Enterprise Value and Operating Income is 0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Enterprise Value that can explain the historical movement of Operating Income in the same time period over historical financial statements of Designer Brands, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Designer Brands' Enterprise Value and Operating Income is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Enterprise Value of Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with its Operating Income. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Operating Income has no effect on the direction of Enterprise Value i.e., Designer Brands' Enterprise Value and Operating Income go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.05 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Insignificant |
Enterprise Value
Enterprise Value (or EV) is usually referred to as Designer Brands theoretical takeover price. In the event of an acquisition, an acquirer would have to take on Designer Brands debt, but would also pocket its cash. Enterprise Value is more accurate representation of Designer Brands value than its market capitalization because it takes into account all of Designer Brands existing debt. A measure of a company's total value, often used as a more comprehensive alternative to equity market capitalization that includes the market capitalization, plus total debt, minority interest and preferred shares, minus total cash and cash equivalents.Operating Income
Operating Income is the amount of profit realized from Designer Brands operations after accounting for operating expenses such as cost of goods sold (COGS), wages and depreciation. Operating income takes the gross income and subtracts other operating expenses and then removes depreciation. Operating Income of Designer Brands is typically a synonym for earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and is also commonly referred to as operating profit or recurring profit. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), representing the amount of profit a company generates from its operations.Most indicators from Designer Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Designer Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.As of now, Designer Brands' Enterprise Value Multiple is decreasing as compared to previous years.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 1.1B | 1.1B | 973.0M | 673.2M | Total Revenue | 3.2B | 3.3B | 3.1B | 2.2B |
Designer Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Designer Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Designer Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 2.5B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.3B | 1.3B | |
Other Current Liab | 142.7M | 154.5M | 163.3M | 138.7M | 112.0M | 95.4M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 680.0M | 752.7M | 758.9M | 636.1M | 622.3M | 363.4M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 720.9M | 243.0M | 412.4M | 429.7M | 359.2M | 581.9M | |
Other Liab | 27.5M | 30.8M | 24.4M | 25.0M | 28.7M | 27.3M | |
Retained Earnings | 267.1M | (228.8M) | (74.3M) | 82.0M | 98.9M | 144.4M | |
Accounts Payable | 299.1M | 245.1M | 340.9M | 255.4M | 289.4M | 188.5M | |
Cash | 86.6M | 59.6M | 72.7M | 58.8M | 49.2M | 74.0M | |
Other Assets | 56.2M | 31.2M | 31.7M | 91.1M | 82.0M | 53.0M | |
Long Term Debt | 190M | 272.3M | 225.5M | 281.0M | 420.3M | 441.4M | |
Inventory | 632.6M | 473.2M | 586.4M | 605.7M | 571.3M | 431.7M | |
Other Current Assets | 67.5M | 51.8M | 55.3M | 47.8M | 73.3M | 59.0M | |
Total Liab | 1.7B | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.6B | 1.9B | 2.0B | |
Intangible Assets | 22.8M | 15.6M | 15.5M | 31.9M | 82.8M | 87.0M | |
Common Stock | 971.4M | 990.2M | 1.0B | 1.0B | 1.0B | 650.3M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 1.1B | 1.1B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 1.2B | 1.3B | 1.0B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
Net Debt | 1.1B | 1.2B | 948.5M | 1.0B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 74.6M | 72.2M | 77.3M | 72.1M | 63.4M | 79.8M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 2.5B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.3B | 1.3B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 1.1B | 980.9M | 843.3M | 940.6M | 1.3B | 1.4B | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (350.9M) | (398.4M) | (515.1M) | (665.8M) | (764.8M) | (726.6M) | |
Good Will | 89.5M | 113.6M | 93.7M | 97.1M | 123.8M | 129.9M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 941.3M | 988.3M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 1.6B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.5B | 1.6B | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 111.5M | 59.6M | 72.7M | 58.8M | 49.2M | 46.7M | |
Net Receivables | 89.2M | 196.0M | 199.8M | 77.8M | 83.6M | 46.3M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 961.2M | 978.8M | 971.4M | 990.2M | 1.1B | 673.7M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 1.9B | 2.0B | |
Total Current Assets | 900.8M | 780.6M | 914.2M | 789.9M | 777.4M | 723.3M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (2.5M) | (3.3M) | (3.6M) | (5.4M) | (5.6M) | (5.9M) | |
Short Term Debt | 186.7M | 307.3M | 202.2M | 190.1M | 173.3M | 92.7M | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 51.6M | 45.8M | 52.5M | 52.0M | 47.6M | 46.9M | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 24.3M | 31.2M | 31.3M | 42.8M | 49.0M | 35.4M | |
Short Term Investments | 124.6M | 69.7M | 25.0M | 58.6M | 52.7M | 50.1M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 584.4M | 133.7M | 303.2M | 303.9M | 273.5M | 537.6M |
Designer Brands Investors Sentiment
The influence of Designer Brands' investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Designer. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock market does not have solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.
Investor biases related to Designer Brands' public news can be used to forecast risks associated with an investment in Designer. The trend in average sentiment can be used to explain how an investor holding Designer can time the market purely based on public headlines and social activities around Designer Brands. Please note that most equities that are difficult to arbitrage are affected by market sentiment the most.
Designer Brands' market sentiment shows the aggregated news analyzed to detect positive and negative mentions from the text and comments. The data is normalized to provide daily scores for Designer Brands' and other traded tickers. The bigger the bubble, the more accurate is the estimated score. Higher bars for a given day show more participation in the average Designer Brands' news discussions. The higher the estimated score, the more favorable is the investor's outlook on Designer Brands.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Designer Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Designer Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Designer Brands options trading.
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Designer Stock
0.64 | W | Wayfair Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
0.68 | AN | AutoNation Earnings Call Next Week | PairCorr |
0.87 | HD | Home Depot Financial Report 21st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Designer Stock
0.46 | BIG | Big Lots Financial Report 24th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.46 | PDD | Pinduoduo Financial Report 24th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.45 | BGI | Birks Group | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.Note that the Designer Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Designer Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets |
Is Designer Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.74) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share 0.46 | Revenue Per Share 50.166 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.