Designer Free Cash Flow vs Total Assets Analysis
DBI Stock | USD 8.85 0.06 0.68% |
Designer Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just examining Designer Brands latest accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Designer Brands is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Designer Brands Free Cash Flow and its Total Assets accounts. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.
Free Cash Flow vs Total Assets
Free Cash Flow vs Total Assets Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Designer Brands Free Cash Flow account and Total Assets. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have no relationship.
The correlation between Designer Brands' Free Cash Flow and Total Assets is 0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Free Cash Flow that can explain the historical movement of Total Assets in the same time period over historical financial statements of Designer Brands, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Designer Brands' Free Cash Flow and Total Assets is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Free Cash Flow of Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with its Total Assets. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Total Assets has no effect on the direction of Free Cash Flow i.e., Designer Brands' Free Cash Flow and Total Assets go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.04 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Insignificant |
Free Cash Flow
The amount of cash a company generates after accounting for cash outflows to support operations and maintain its capital assets.Total Assets
Total assets refers to the total amount of Designer Brands assets owned. Assets are items that have some economic value and are expended over time to create a benefit for the owner. These assets are usually recorded in Designer Brands books under different categories such as cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable,prepaid expenses, inventory, fixed assets, intangible assets, other assets, marketable securities, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and others. The total value of all owned resources that are expected to provide future economic benefits to the business, including cash, investments, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets.Most indicators from Designer Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Designer Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.As of now, Designer Brands' Enterprise Value Multiple is decreasing as compared to previous years.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 1.1B | 1.1B | 973.0M | 673.2M | Total Revenue | 3.2B | 3.3B | 3.1B | 2.2B |
Designer Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Designer Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Designer Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 2.5B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.3B | 1.3B | |
Other Current Liab | 142.7M | 154.5M | 163.3M | 138.7M | 112.0M | 95.4M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 680.0M | 752.7M | 758.9M | 636.1M | 622.3M | 363.4M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 720.9M | 243.0M | 412.4M | 429.7M | 359.2M | 581.9M | |
Other Liab | 27.5M | 30.8M | 24.4M | 25.0M | 28.7M | 27.3M | |
Retained Earnings | 267.1M | (228.8M) | (74.3M) | 82.0M | 98.9M | 144.4M | |
Accounts Payable | 299.1M | 245.1M | 340.9M | 255.4M | 289.4M | 188.5M | |
Cash | 86.6M | 59.6M | 72.7M | 58.8M | 49.2M | 74.0M | |
Other Assets | 56.2M | 31.2M | 31.7M | 91.1M | 82.0M | 53.0M | |
Long Term Debt | 190M | 272.3M | 225.5M | 281.0M | 420.3M | 441.4M | |
Inventory | 632.6M | 473.2M | 586.4M | 605.7M | 571.3M | 431.7M | |
Other Current Assets | 67.5M | 51.8M | 55.3M | 47.8M | 73.3M | 59.0M | |
Total Liab | 1.7B | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.6B | 1.9B | 2.0B | |
Intangible Assets | 22.8M | 15.6M | 15.5M | 31.9M | 82.8M | 87.0M | |
Common Stock | 971.4M | 990.2M | 1.0B | 1.0B | 1.0B | 650.3M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 1.1B | 1.1B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 1.2B | 1.3B | 1.0B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
Net Debt | 1.1B | 1.2B | 948.5M | 1.0B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 74.6M | 72.2M | 77.3M | 72.1M | 63.4M | 79.8M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 2.5B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.3B | 1.3B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 1.1B | 980.9M | 843.3M | 940.6M | 1.3B | 1.4B | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (350.9M) | (398.4M) | (515.1M) | (665.8M) | (764.8M) | (726.6M) | |
Good Will | 89.5M | 113.6M | 93.7M | 97.1M | 123.8M | 129.9M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 941.3M | 988.3M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 1.6B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.5B | 1.6B | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 111.5M | 59.6M | 72.7M | 58.8M | 49.2M | 46.7M | |
Net Receivables | 89.2M | 196.0M | 199.8M | 77.8M | 83.6M | 46.3M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 961.2M | 978.8M | 971.4M | 990.2M | 1.1B | 673.7M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 1.9B | 2.0B | |
Total Current Assets | 900.8M | 780.6M | 914.2M | 789.9M | 777.4M | 723.3M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (2.5M) | (3.3M) | (3.6M) | (5.4M) | (5.6M) | (5.9M) | |
Short Term Debt | 186.7M | 307.3M | 202.2M | 190.1M | 173.3M | 92.7M | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 51.6M | 45.8M | 52.5M | 52.0M | 47.6M | 46.9M | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 24.3M | 31.2M | 31.3M | 42.8M | 49.0M | 35.4M | |
Short Term Investments | 124.6M | 69.7M | 25.0M | 58.6M | 52.7M | 50.1M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 584.4M | 133.7M | 303.2M | 303.9M | 273.5M | 537.6M |
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Designer Stock
0.64 | AN | AutoNation Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
0.87 | HD | Home Depot Financial Report 21st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Designer Stock
0.48 | WNW | Meiwu Technology Report 10th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.41 | ZUMZ | Zumiez Inc Financial Report 6th of June 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.Note that the Designer Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Designer Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency |
Is Designer Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.74) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share 0.46 | Revenue Per Share 50.166 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.