LegalZoom Company Insiders
| LZ Stock | USD 6.78 0.07 1.04% |
LegalZoom's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading LegalZoom stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. LegalZoom employs about 1.2 K people. The company is managed by 12 executives with a total tenure of roughly 2777 years, averaging almost 231.0 years of service per executive, having 99.17 employees per reported executive.
LegalZoom's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-03-15 | Richard Preece | Disposed 9462 @ 13.17 | View | ||
| 2024-03-01 | John Francis Murphy | Disposed 10000 @ 12.47 | View | ||
| 2024-02-22 | Nicole Miller | Disposed 24557 @ 9.75 | View | ||
| 2024-02-16 | Nicole Miller | Disposed 16536 @ 10.64 | View | ||
| 2023-12-11 | Nicole Miller | Disposed 21528 @ 10.74 | View | ||
| 2023-11-16 | Noel Bertram Watson | Disposed 25000 @ 11.17 | View | ||
| 2023-11-13 | Dipan Patel | Disposed 15099993 @ 10.84 | View | ||
| 2023-10-19 | Dipan Patel | Disposed 2094240 @ 9.55 | View | ||
| 2023-09-11 | Dipan Patel | Disposed 20818755 @ 9.55 | View |
Monitoring LegalZoom's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
LegalZoom |
LegalZoom's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like LegalZoom, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in LegalZoom by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2021-11-28 | Representative Alan S Lowenthal | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
LegalZoom Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.043 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.043. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.1325 %, which means that it produced $0.1325 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. LegalZoom's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well LegalZoom manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, LegalZoom's Return On Tangible Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to rise to 0.03 in 2024, whereas Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.12 in 2024. At this time, LegalZoom's Net Tangible Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Currrent Assets Other is likely to rise to about 15 M in 2024, whereas Total Assets are likely to drop slightly above 290.2 M in 2024.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 193.6 M in 2024. Net Loss is likely to rise to about (41.7 M) in 2024
LegalZoom Workforce Comparison
LegalZoom is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is now estimated at about 144,709. LegalZoom maintains roughly 1,190 in number of employees contributing less than 1% to equities under Industrials industry.
LegalZoom Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.03 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.03 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.03.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.49 | 0.6175 |
|
|
LegalZoom Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific LegalZoom insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on LegalZoom's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, LegalZoom insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 63,240 | 179,926 |
| 2024-03-01 | 0.4444 | 4 | 9 | 1,040,939 | 323,192 |
| 2023-06-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 60,030 | 75,933 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.4286 | 10 | 7 | 4,980,103 | 170,481 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 255,300 | 88,370 |
| 2022-06-01 | 1.4 | 7 | 5 | 3,734,460 | 10,874,554 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.3333 | 8 | 6 | 2,044,579 | 59,673 |
| 2021-09-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 109,623,010 | 54,806,532 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.9231 | 12 | 13 | 1,170,525 | 42,518,977 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.9091 | 10 | 11 | 60,795 | 37,140 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 49,475 | 130,042 |
| 2010-06-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 4,125 | 1,189 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.6667 | 24 | 36 | 212,520 | 329,990 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 27,000 | 62,669 |
| 2009-09-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 87,100 | 172,200 |
| 2009-06-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 9,110 | 31.00 |
| 2009-03-01 | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | 149,042 | 20,812 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.6522 | 15 | 23 | 167,400 | 38,742 |
| 2007-12-01 | 0.2321 | 13 | 56 | 28,365 | 73,528 |
| 2007-06-01 | 2.5 | 15 | 6 | 30,575 | 50,390 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.6 | 18 | 30 | 160,909 | 91,958 |
| 2006-12-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 10,208 | 19,203 |
| 2006-09-01 | 1.7143 | 12 | 7 | 27,042 | 32,389 |
| 2006-06-01 | 2.4444 | 22 | 9 | 21,574 | 13,344 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.8182 | 18 | 22 | 53,867 | 75,862 |
| 2005-09-01 | 1.5 | 12 | 8 | 62,804 | 118,150 |
| 2005-03-01 | 1.0 | 21 | 21 | 101,016 | 164,883 |
| 2004-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 647.49 | 2,000 |
| 2004-09-01 | 1.0 | 8 | 8 | 34,257 | 40,075 |
| 2004-06-01 | 0.75 | 6 | 8 | 67,906 | 93,040 |
| 2004-03-01 | 1.1818 | 13 | 11 | 40,506 | 39,341 |
| 2003-09-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 7,813 | 13,564 |
LegalZoom Notable Stakeholders
A LegalZoom stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as LegalZoom often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. LegalZoom's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting LegalZoom's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Nicole Miller | General VP | Profile | |
| Madeleine Crane | Head Relations | Profile | |
| Daniel Vivier | Head Relations | Profile | |
| Danny Vivier | Head Relations | Profile | |
| Sheily Panchal | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Daniel Wernikoff | CEO Director | Profile | |
| Shrisha Radhakrishna | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Richard Preece | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Kathy Tsitovich | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Noel Watson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Robert Shapiro | CoFounder | Profile | |
| Daniel Lysaught | Chief Officer | Profile |
About LegalZoom Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as LegalZoom often depends on how effective the management is. LegalZoom management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of LegalZoom management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the LegalZoom management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.04 | 0.04 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.08 | 0.09 |
The data published in LegalZoom's official financial statements typically reflect LegalZoom's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. However, there are additional fundamental indicators that are easier to understand and visualize along the underlying realities that are driving LegalZoom's quantitative information. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by LegalZoom accountants, it's essential to understand LegalZoom's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality within the context of the Commercial Services & Supplies space in which it operates.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in LegalZoom's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of LegalZoom. Check LegalZoom's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of LegalZoom's management manipulating its earnings.
LegalZoom Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as LegalZoom use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare LegalZoom within its industry.LegalZoom Manpower Efficiency
Return on LegalZoom Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 555.2K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 55.1M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 11.7K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 1.2M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 9.6K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 947.9K |
Additional Tools for LegalZoom Stock Analysis
When running LegalZoom's price analysis, check to measure LegalZoom's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy LegalZoom is operating at the current time. Most of LegalZoom's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of LegalZoom's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move LegalZoom's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of LegalZoom to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.