Correlation Between Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Epsilon Energy with a short position of Crescent Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Epsilon and Crescent is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Crescent Energy and Epsilon Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Epsilon Energy are associated (or correlated) with Crescent Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Crescent Energy has no effect on the direction of Epsilon Energy i.e., Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Epsilon Energy is expected to generate 1.21 times less return on investment than Crescent Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Epsilon Energy is 1.89 times less risky than Crescent Energy. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Crescent Energy Co is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,083  in Crescent Energy Co on February 18, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  119.00  from holding Crescent Energy Co or generate 10.99% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Epsilon Energy  vs.  Crescent Energy Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Epsilon Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Epsilon Energy are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Epsilon Energy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in June 2024.
Crescent Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Crescent Energy Co are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal technical and fundamental indicators, Crescent Energy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in June 2024.

Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Epsilon Energy position performs unexpectedly, Crescent Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crescent Energy will offset losses from the drop in Crescent Energy's long position.
The idea behind Epsilon Energy and Crescent Energy Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets