Will Chindata Group (NASDAQ:CD) and Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) deliver in August?

While some millenniums may be indifferent towards communication services space, we will examine how strong are Facebook fundamentals compared to Chindata Group. We are going to analyze some of the competitive aspects of both Facebook and Chindata.
Published over a year ago
View all stories for Meta Platforms | View All Stories
Macroaxis uses a strict editorial review process to publish stories and blog posts. Our publishers support our company and may receive a small commission when the partner links or references are utilized. Commissions do not affect the opinions or evaluations of our editorial team. The information our editors and media partners deliver is confidential and licensed for your sole use as a Macroaxis user. We reserve all rights to the content of this article, and therefore copying or distributing this story in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.

Reviewed by Michael Smolkin

By analyzing existing fundamental drivers between Facebook and Chindata, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on both companies' prices and check if they can diversify away market risk if combined in one of your portfolios. You can also utilize pair trading strategies for matching a long position in Chindata with a short position in Facebook. Check out our pair correlation module for more information.

Let's begin by analyzing the assets.
The asset utilization indicator refers to the revenue earned for every dollar of assets a company currently reports. Facebook has an asset utilization ratio of 191.07 percent. This suggests that the company is making $1.91 for each dollar of assets. An increasing asset utilization means that Facebook is more efficient with each dollar of assets it utilizes for everyday operations.
Out of tens of thousands of stocks, funds, and ETFs that trade on global exchanges each represent an individual company which you can analyze using comparative analysis. To determine which one of the two entities, such as Meta or Meta is a better fit for your portfolio, analyzing a few basic fundamental indicators is a good first step.

How important is Meta Platforms's Liquidity

Meta Platforms financial leverage refers to using borrowed capital as a funding source to finance Meta Platforms ongoing operations. It is usually used to expand the firm's asset base and generate returns on borrowed capital. Meta Platforms financial leverage is typically calculated by taking the company's all interest-bearing debt and dividing it by total capital. So the higher the debt-to-capital ratio (i.e., financial leverage), the riskier the company. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Meta Platforms' owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if the firm cannot cover its debt costs. The degree of Meta Platforms' financial leverage can be measured in several ways, including by ratios such as the debt-to-equity ratio (total debt / total equity), equity multiplier (total assets / total equity), or the debt ratio (total debt / total assets). Please check the breakdown between Meta Platforms's total debt and its cash.

Correlation Between Meta and Meta Platforms

In general, Delisted Stock analysis is a method for investors and traders to make individual buying and selling decisions. Stock correlation analysis is also essential because it can help investors realize that they may not be as diversified as they think. Risk management strategies are usually required to make sure all portfolios are properly aligned against their risk tolerance level. You can consider holding Meta Platforms together with similar or unrelated positions with a negative correlation. For example, you can also add Meta Platforms to your portfolio. If Meta Platforms is not perfectly correlated to Meta Platforms it will diversify some of the market risks out of the positively correlated stocks in your portfolio. However, the disadvantage of this sort of hedging is that it can potentially affect your investment returns throughout market cycles. When Meta Platforms, for example, performs excellent and delivers stable returns, the negatively correlated position you locked in as a hedge may drag your returns down.
Are you currently holding both Meta Platforms and Meta Platforms in your portfolio? Please note if you are using this as a pair-trade strategy between Meta Platforms and Meta Platforms, watch out for correlation discrepancy over time. Relying on the historical price correlations and assuming that it will not change may lead to short-term losses. Please check pair correlation details between FB and META for more information.

Breaking down Meta Platforms Further

Revenue is income that a firm generates from business activities such us rendering services or selling goods to customers. It is a crucial part of a business and an essential item when evaluating a company's financial statements. Revenues from a firm's primary business operations can be reported on the income statement as sales revenue, net sales, or simply sales, depending on the industry in which a given company operates.
Revenue is typically recorded when cash or cash equivalents are exchanged for services or goods and can include product or services discounts, promotions, as well as early payments on invoices or services rendered in advance.

Revenue Breakdown

Now, let's check Facebook revenue. Based on the latest financial disclosure, Facebook reported 94.4 B of revenue. This is much higher than that of the Communication Services sector and significantly higher than that of the Internet Content & Information industry. The revenue for all United States stocks is significantly lower than that of the stock. As for Chindata Group we see revenue of 2.08 B, which is much higher than that of the Internet Content & Information
FB
94.4 B
FB94.4 Billion97.84
Sector0.00.0
CD2.08 Billion2.16

Will Facebook continue to go out of control?

Current information ratio is at 0.12.
As of the 30th of July, Facebook shows the Semi Deviation of 1.26, downside deviation of 1.47, and Mean Deviation of 1.39. Facebook technical analysis allows you to utilize historical prices and volume patterns in order to determine a pattern that computes the direction of the firm's future prices. Put another way, you can use this information to find out if the firm will indeed mirror its model of historical prices and volume momentum, or the prices will eventually revert. We have analyzed nineteen technical drivers for Facebook, which can be compared to its rivals. Please confirm Facebook variance, maximum drawdown, and the relationship between the coefficient of variation and jensen alpha to decide if Facebook is priced favorably, providing market reflects its regular price of 358.32 per share. Given that Facebook has jensen alpha of 0.2224, we urge you to verify Facebook's prevailing market performance to make sure the company can sustain itself at a future point.

Our Conclusion on Facebook

Whereas some other firms in the internet content & information industry are either recovering or due for a correction, Facebook may not be as strong as the others in terms of longer-term growth potentials. While some short-term oriented investors may not share our view, we believe it may be a good time to purchase new shares of Facebook.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect

Editorial Staff

This story should be regarded as informational only and should not be considered a solicitation to sell or buy any financial products. Macroaxis does not express any opinion as to the present or future value of any investments referred to in this post. This post may not be reproduced without the consent of Macroaxis LLC. Macroaxis LLC and Raphi Shpitalnik do not own shares of Meta Platforms. Please refer to our Terms of Use for any information regarding our disclosure principles.

Would you like to provide feedback on the content of this article?

You can get in touch with us directly or send us a quick note via email to editors@macroaxis.com