Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Kraft Heinz. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz

-0.05
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Kraft is -0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kraft Heinz and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Kraft Heinz. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kraft Heinz has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.59 times less return on investment than Kraft Heinz. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 1.0 times less risky than Kraft Heinz. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Kraft Heinz Co is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,706  in Kraft Heinz Co on January 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  110.00  from holding Kraft Heinz Co or generate 2.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Kraft Heinz Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Kraft Heinz 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kraft Heinz Co are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical indicators, Kraft Heinz is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Kraft Heinz can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kraft Heinz will offset losses from the drop in Kraft Heinz's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Kraft Heinz Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments