Correlation Between Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Restaurant Brands International and Bloomin Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Restaurant Brands with a short position of Bloomin Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Restaurant and Bloomin is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Restaurant Brands Internationa and Bloomin Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with Bloomin Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bloomin Brands has no effect on the direction of Restaurant Brands i.e., Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Restaurant Brands International is expected to generate 0.66 times more return on investment than Bloomin Brands. However, Restaurant Brands International is 1.52 times less risky than Bloomin Brands. It trades about -0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bloomin Brands is currently generating about -0.47 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,435  in Restaurant Brands International on February 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (605.00) from holding Restaurant Brands International or give up 8.14% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Restaurant Brands Internationa  vs.  Bloomin Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Restaurant Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Restaurant Brands International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain invariable and the latest agitation on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-running gains for the enterprise retail investors.
Bloomin Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bloomin Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in June 2024. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, Bloomin Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bloomin Brands will offset losses from the drop in Bloomin Brands' long position.
The idea behind Restaurant Brands International and Bloomin Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation