High Cost Of Revenue vs Interest Expense Analysis
HWO Stock | CAD 1.33 0.01 0.76% |
High Arctic financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just examining High Arctic Energy latest accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether High Arctic Energy is a good investment. Please check the relationship between High Arctic Cost Of Revenue and its Interest Expense accounts. Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in High Arctic Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
Cost Of Revenue vs Interest Expense
Cost Of Revenue vs Interest Expense Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of High Arctic Energy Cost Of Revenue account and Interest Expense. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have no relationship.
The correlation between High Arctic's Cost Of Revenue and Interest Expense is 0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Cost Of Revenue that can explain the historical movement of Interest Expense in the same time period over historical financial statements of High Arctic Energy, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of High Arctic's Cost Of Revenue and Interest Expense is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Cost Of Revenue of High Arctic Energy are associated (or correlated) with its Interest Expense. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Interest Expense has no effect on the direction of Cost Of Revenue i.e., High Arctic's Cost Of Revenue and Interest Expense go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.02 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Insignificant |
Cost Of Revenue
Cost of Revenue is found on High Arctic Energy income statement and represents the costs associated with goods and services High Arctic provides. Indirect cost, such as salaries, is not included. In other words, cost of revenue is the total cost incurred to obtain a sale. It is more than the traditional cost of goods sold, since it includes specific selling and marketing activities.Interest Expense
The cost incurred by an entity for borrowed funds, including loans, bonds, or lines of credit.Most indicators from High Arctic's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into High Arctic Energy current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in High Arctic Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. At this time, High Arctic's Selling General Administrative is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 12th of May 2024, Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is likely to grow to 0.17, though Tax Provision is likely to grow to (3.2 M).
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 670K | 1.4M | 368K | 349.6K | Depreciation And Amortization | 23.6M | 17.7M | 20.4M | 19.7M |
High Arctic fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
High Arctic Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
High Arctic fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 251.8M | 214.2M | 185.5M | 134.0M | 123.1M | 201.6M | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 10.7M | 19.2M | 16.5M | 5.7M | 5.1M | 4.9M | |
Other Current Liab | 10.7M | 500K | 664K | 470K | 540.5K | 513.5K | |
Total Current Liabilities | 26.2M | 11M | 15.4M | 9.8M | 16.5M | 15.6M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 205.6M | 177.3M | 148.9M | 115.2M | 99.3M | 131.1M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 181.5M | 147.8M | 130.6M | 54.3M | 30.2M | 28.7M | |
Net Debt | 1.4M | (13.4M) | 4.5M | (13.9M) | (12.5M) | (11.9M) | |
Retained Earnings | (2.2M) | (29.7M) | (58.1M) | (96.9M) | (112.2M) | (117.8M) | |
Accounts Payable | 13.9M | 9.1M | 13.4M | 8.7M | 5.4M | 5.1M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 189.1M | 158.4M | 140.3M | 64.7M | 43.7M | 41.5M | |
Net Receivables | 43.1M | 13.2M | 21.7M | 39.6M | 17.5M | 32.1M | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 50.0M | 49.5M | 48.8M | 48.7M | 49.1M | 42.2M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 251.8M | 214.2M | 185.5M | 134.0M | 154.1M | 201.7M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 9.9M | 13.7M | 13.8M | 14.7M | 13.2M | 12.6M | |
Total Liab | 46.2M | 36.9M | 36.6M | 18.7M | 23.8M | 22.6M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 181.5M | 147.8M | 378.5M | 215.0M | 179.8M | 156.0M | |
Total Current Assets | 62.7M | 55.8M | 45.1M | 69.3M | 79.4M | 66.4M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 24.8M | 24M | 23.4M | 27.9M | 32.0M | 33.6M | |
Cash | 9.3M | 32.6M | 12.0M | 19.6M | 50.3M | 26.5M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 9.3M | 32.6M | 12.0M | 19.6M | 22.5M | 26.0M | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 20M | 25.9M | 21.2M | 8.9M | 7.4M | 7.0M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 195.5M | 187.5M | 183M | 169.3M | 152.4M | 149.7M | |
Common Stock | 173.1M | 169.3M | 169.7M | 169.6M | 152.6M | 142.0M | |
Other Liab | 10.2M | 8.1M | 6.1M | 3.9M | 4.5M | 8.1M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 205.6M | 177.3M | 148.9M | 115.2M | 103.7M | 145.7M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 181.5M | 147.8M | 130.6M | 54.3M | 48.9M | 46.5M | |
Long Term Debt Total | 9.1M | 17.8M | 15.1M | 5.0M | 5.8M | 7.2M | |
Capital Surpluse | 9.9M | 13.7M | 13.8M | 14.7M | 16.9M | 12.3M | |
Capital Lease Obligations | 10.7M | 9.2M | 8.4M | 1.5M | 2.8M | 5.1M | |
Net Invested Capital | 205.6M | 187.3M | 156.6M | 119.3M | 102.7M | 141.3M | |
Net Working Capital | 35.8M | 44.8M | 29.7M | 59.5M | 63.0M | 53.9M |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards High Arctic in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, High Arctic's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from High Arctic options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in High Arctic Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Complementary Tools for High Stock analysis
When running High Arctic's price analysis, check to measure High Arctic's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy High Arctic is operating at the current time. Most of High Arctic's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of High Arctic's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move High Arctic's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of High Arctic to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities |