Microsoft Stock Revenue
| MSFT Stock | USD 422.54 2.89 0.68% |
Microsoft fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Microsoft's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Microsoft Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Microsoft's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Microsoft stock.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Total Revenue | 245.1 B | 257.4 B |
Microsoft | Revenue |
Microsoft Company Revenue Analysis
Microsoft's Revenue is income that a firm generates from business activities such us rendering services or selling goods to customers. It is a crucial part of a business and an essential item when evaluating a company's financial statements. Revenues from a firm's primary business operations can be reported on the income statement as sales revenue, net sales, or simply sales, depending on the industry in which a given company operates.
Current Microsoft Revenue | 245.12 B |
Most of Microsoft's fundamental indicators, such as Revenue, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Microsoft is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Historical and Projected quarterly revenue of Microsoft
Projected quarterly revenue analysis of Microsoft provides investors and stakeholders with an insight into the company's performance and growth prospects. When actual revenues of Microsoft match or exceed analyst estimates, it positively influences investor confidence and market perception, often leading to a rise in Microsoft's stock price.
Microsoft Revenue Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Microsoft is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Microsoft Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Revenue. Since Microsoft's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Microsoft's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Microsoft's interrelated accounts and indicators.
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.8 | 0.99 | 0.55 | ||
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.78 | 1.0 | 0.56 | ||
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 0.53 | ||
| 0.8 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.8 | 0.49 | ||
| 0.99 | 1.0 | 0.99 | 0.8 | 0.57 | ||
| 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.57 |
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Microsoft Revenue Historical Pattern
Today, most investors in Microsoft Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Microsoft's growth ratios. Consistent increases or drops in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's revenue growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use a static breakdown of Microsoft revenue as a starting point in their analysis.
Microsoft Revenue |
| Timeline |
Revenue is typically recorded when cash or cash equivalents are exchanged for services or goods and can include products or services discounts, promotions, as well as early payments on invoices or services rendered in advance.
| Competition |
Microsoft Current Deferred Revenue
Current Deferred Revenue |
|
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Microsoft reported 245.12 B of revenue. This is much higher than that of the Software sector and significantly higher than that of the Information Technology industry. The revenue for all United States stocks is significantly lower than that of the firm.
Microsoft Revenue Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Microsoft's direct or indirect competition against its Revenue to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Microsoft could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Microsoft by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Microsoft is currently under evaluation in revenue category among its peers.
Microsoft ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Microsoft's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Microsoft's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Microsoft Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Microsoft that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Microsoft's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Microsoft's value.| Shares | Capital World Investors | 2024-06-30 | 74.7 M | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-06-30 | 74.6 M | Bank Of America Corp | 2024-06-30 | 68.9 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-06-30 | 64.2 M | Legal & General Group Plc | 2024-06-30 | 61.8 M | Wellington Management Company Llp | 2024-06-30 | 54 M | Nuveen Asset Management, Llc | 2024-06-30 | 52.5 M | Ubs Asset Mgmt Americas Inc | 2024-06-30 | 52.5 M | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2024-06-30 | 46.6 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2024-06-30 | 675.9 M | Blackrock Inc | 2024-06-30 | 554 M |
Microsoft Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.36 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.15 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.36 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.47 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 3.15 T | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 7.43 B | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.05 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 73.70 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 60.31 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 26.64 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 10.99 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 12.44 X | ||||
| Revenue | 245.12 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 165.36 B | ||||
| EBITDA | 131.72 B | ||||
| Net Income | 88.14 B | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 34.7 B | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 14.39 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 67.13 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 0.44 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.84 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 38.69 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 118.55 B | ||||
| Short Ratio | 3.26 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 12.25 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.25 X | ||||
| Target Price | 497.6 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 228 K | ||||
| Beta | 0.9 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 3.16 T | ||||
| Total Asset | 512.16 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 173.14 B | ||||
| Working Capital | 34.45 B | ||||
| Current Asset | 139.66 B | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 59.36 B | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.01 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 1.18 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 512.16 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 3.08 |
About Microsoft Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Microsoft's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Microsoft using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Microsoft based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Thematic Opportunities
Explore Investment Opportunities
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.