Alan Bernikow - Destination Independent Director
| DXLG Stock | USD 3.37 0.03 0.88% |
Director
Mr. Alan S. Bernikow serves as an Independent Director of the company. He was a director since June 29, 2003. From 1998 until his retirement in May 2003, Mr. Bernikow was the Deputy Chief Executive Officer at Deloitte Touche LLP where he was responsible for assisting the firm on special projects such as firm mergers and acquisitions, litigation matters and partner affairs. He was a member of Deloitte Touches Executive Management Committees Chairman for the Professional Asset Indemnity Limited Bermuda Big 4 Insurance Representatives and President for the PAIL Vermont Insurance Company Big 4 Insurance Representatives. Mr. Bernikow joined Touche Ross, the predecessor firm of Deloitte Touche LLP, in 1977, prior to which Mr. Bernikow was the National Administrative Partner in Charge for the accounting firm of J.K. Lasser Company. Mr. Bernikow is a member of the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc., a NYSElisted company, and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Revlon, Inc. as well as Chairman of the Revlon, Inc. Compensation and Stock Plan Committee the Lead Independent Director of the Board of Directors of MackCali, as well as the Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Executive Committee of MackCali and serves as a Director of the Board of the UBS Global Asset Management Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UBS AG, including serving as Chairman of its Audit Committee. Mr. Bernikow has had extensive international experience in his role in Deloitte Touches managementrisk management group, as well as worldwide insurance responsibilities since 2003.
| Age | 74 |
| Tenure | 21 years |
| Address | 555 Turnpike Street, Canton, MA, United States, 02021 |
| Phone | 781 828 9300 |
| Web | https://www.dxl.com |
Destination Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0742 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0742 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1947 %, meaning that it created $0.1947 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Destination's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Destination manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to decrease to -0.05. The current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to decrease to -0.06. At this time, Destination's Fixed Asset Turnover is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Destination's current Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 1.59, while Non Current Assets Total are projected to decrease to roughly 107.2 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Isabella Goren | Gap Inc | 59 | |
| Sarah Gallagher | Abercrombie Fitch | 68 | |
| Tricia Patrick | Lululemon Athletica | 36 | |
| Felix Carbullido | Abercrombie Fitch | 53 | |
| William Fisher | Gap Inc | 63 | |
| Craig Stapleton | Abercrombie Fitch | 70 | |
| Steven Collins | Lululemon Athletica | 47 | |
| Domenico Sole | Gap Inc | 71 | |
| Nigel Travis | Abercrombie Fitch | 70 | |
| Brian Goldner | Gap Inc | 54 | |
| Stephanie Shern | Abercrombie Fitch | 68 | |
| Jorge Montoya | Gap Inc | 73 | |
| Alan Feldman | Foot Locker | 69 | |
| Dona Young | Foot Locker | 66 | |
| Amy Bohutinsky | Gap Inc | 43 | |
| Cheryl Turpin | Foot Locker | 70 | |
| Stephanie Ferris | Lululemon Athletica | 44 | |
| RoAnn Costin | Lululemon Athletica | 61 | |
| John Fisher | Gap Inc | 58 | |
| Jon McNeill | Lululemon Athletica | 49 | |
| Martha Morfitt | Lululemon Athletica | 60 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.19 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0742 |
Destination XL Group Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Destination's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Destination inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Destination. The board's role is to monitor Destination's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Destination's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Destination's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Stacey Jones, Chief Officer | ||
| Francis Chane, Senior Vice President - Distribution and Logistics | ||
| George Porter, Independent Director | ||
| Jim Reath, Chief Officer | ||
| Harvey Kanter, President CEO, Director | ||
| Anthony Gaeta, Senior Vice President | ||
| Nancy Youssef, Senior Vice President - International Business Development | ||
| John Kyees, Director | ||
| Brian Reaves, Sr. VP of Store Sales and Operations | ||
| Sahal Laher, Senior Vice President Chief Digital and Information Officer | ||
| Willem Mesdag, Director | ||
| Jesse Choper, Independent Director | ||
| John Cooney, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Ward Mooney, Independent Director | ||
| Walter Sprague, Senior Vice President - Human Resources | ||
| Peter Schmitz, Senior Vice President Chief Real Estate Officer | ||
| Peter Stratton, CFO, Sr. VP and Treasurer | ||
| Robert Molloy, Sr. VP, General Counsel and Secretary | ||
| Ivy Ross, Independent Director | ||
| Oliver Walsh, Director | ||
| Jack Boyle, Director | ||
| Derrick Walker, Chief Marketing Officer and Sr. VP | ||
| Lionel Conacher, Independent Director | ||
| Seymour Holtzman, Chairman of the Board | ||
| Jack McKinney, Senior Vice President CIO | ||
| Alan Bernikow, Independent Director | ||
| Kenneth Ederle, Chief Merchandising Officer and Sr. VP | ||
| David Levin, CEO and President and Director | ||
| Allison Surette, Senior Vice President General Merchandise | ||
| Mitchell Presser, Independent Director | ||
| Angela Chan, Senior Vice President Chief Sourcing Officer | ||
| Jonathan Sainsbury, Chief Officer | ||
| Angela Chew, Senior Vice President - Global Sourcing and Product Development | ||
| Robert Bogan, Chief Officer |
Destination Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Destination a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.19 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0742 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.05 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.06 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 289.91 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 57.99 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 10.46 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 84.46 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 4.47 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 4.95 X |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Destination in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Destination's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Destination options trading.
Pair Trading with Destination
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Destination position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Destination will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Destination Stock
| 0.72 | FL | Foot Locker Financial Report 17th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Destination Stock
| 0.86 | HNHPF | Hon Hai Precision | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | AMZN | Amazon Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | BH | Biglari Holdings Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.76 | UEIC | Universal Electronics Financial Report 2nd of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | WMT | Walmart Financial Report 16th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Destination could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Destination when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Destination - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Destination XL Group to buy it.
The correlation of Destination is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Destination moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Destination XL Group moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Destination can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Destination XL Group. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of economic analysis. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.
Complementary Tools for Destination Stock analysis
When running Destination's price analysis, check to measure Destination's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Destination is operating at the current time. Most of Destination's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Destination's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Destination's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Destination to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. |
Is Destination's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Destination. If investors know Destination will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Destination listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.38) | Earnings Share 0.43 | Revenue Per Share 8.552 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.05) | Return On Assets 0.0742 |
The market value of Destination XL Group is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Destination that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Destination's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Destination's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Destination's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Destination's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Destination's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Destination is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Destination's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.